Skip to main content

Costco Slip-and-Fall: Jury Awards Arin Phillips $50K

Costco Slip-and-Fall: Jury Awards Arin Phillips $50K

SC

Sohini Chakraborty

Sohini Chakraborty is a lawyer, with over two years of experience in legal research and analysis. She specializes in working closely with expert witnesses, offering critical support in preparing legal research and detailed case studies.

4 min read
Costco Slip-and-Fall: Jury Awards Arin Phillips $50K

Case Background

In March 2022, Arin Phillips visited the Costco-Kendall store in Miami-Dade County, Florida, for routine shopping. While walking through an aisle filled with household goods, her foot slipped on a wet spot on the floor. There were no cones, warning signs, or employees nearby to alert customers about the hazard. She fell hard, landing on her right hip and shoulder. Other shoppers hurried to help as store workers called for medical assistance. Paramedics arrived within minutes and transported Phillips to a nearby hospital, where doctors diagnosed a fractured hip and shoulder injuries.

Phillips later said that her life changed after the fall. The accident disrupted her daily routine, work, and physical well-being. What had begun as a normal afternoon of shopping turned into months of medical care and rehabilitation.

Cause

Phillips claimed Costco was negligent in maintaining safe conditions for shoppers. She argued that employees failed to inspect the area or clean up the spill in time. According to her, the liquid had been on the floor long enough that store staff should have noticed and acted. She also stated that Costco did not place any warning signs or block off the dangerous area.

Injury

The fall fractured Phillips’s right hip and damaged her shoulder. Doctors performed surgery to repair her hip. She required extensive physical therapy and rehabilitation to regain her mobility. Even after treatment, she experienced pain, stiffness, and limited movement. Her injuries interfered with simple activities like walking long distances or lifting objects, making ordinary tasks challenging.

Damages

Phillips’s medical bills quickly mounted. Beyond the financial burden, she described emotional distress and reduced quality of life. The damages included significant sums for her pain and suffering, disability, and loss of enjoyment of life.

Plaintiff: Arin Phillips

·      Counsel for Plaintiff: Geralda David | Brandon E Stein | Jason R Brenner

·      Experts for Plaintiff: Cesar De Beche | Charles Javier Jordan | Daniel Manganelli | Julio Martinez | Edgardo A. Agrait-Bertran | Betsabe Andres | Alejandro J. Centurion

Defendant: Costco Wholesale Corporation (Costco-Kendall Store)

·      Counsel for Defendant: Jordan M. Greenberg | Yanina F. Onyewenjo | Kelley Kronenberg | Aaron D. Neifeld

·      Experts for Defendant: Julian Anthony Cameron | Francis Anthony Ferraro

Key Arguments and Proceedings

Phillips’s counsel told jurors that Costco, a national retailer with significant resources, failed to uphold its duty to protect customers. They emphasized that crowded stores require consistent inspections and fast responses to hazards. They argued that Phillips’s life would never be the same and that she deserved fair compensation for her pain and financial losses.

Costco’s attorneys countered that Phillips bore responsibility for her own safety. They suggested she was distracted and failed to notice her surroundings. They stressed that the company acted responsibly, followed its safety procedures, and should not be blamed for a sudden spill. They asked the jury to consider Phillips’s own negligence and to reduce any award accordingly.

Claims

Phillips filed a negligence claim, stating that Costco breached its duty of care to provide a safe shopping environment. She sought compensation for her medical expenses, lost quality of life, and pain and suffering. Her claim focused on Costco’s alleged failure to inspect and maintain its premises properly.

Defense

Costco denied all allegations of negligence. The company argued that Phillips’s actions contributed to her injuries. Their affirmative defenses included comparative negligence, failure to mitigate damages, and intervening causes beyond Costco’s control. They also raised statutory defenses regarding the calculation of damages and insurance setoffs. Costco’s position was that any hazard was short-lived or created by a third party, and that the company responded appropriately to maintain safety.

Jury Verdict

After deliberations, the jury on 1st of August, found Costco negligent and concluded that its negligence caused Phillips’s injuries. However, the jury also found that Phillips shared responsibility for the fall. They assigned 60 percent of the fault to Costco and 40 percent to Phillips. The jury awarded her $27,153 for past medical expenses and $11,423 for pain, suffering, and loss of enjoyment of life. The total damages awarded was $50,000.

Court Documents

Complaint

Jury Verdict

About the Author

SC

Sohini Chakraborty

Sohini Chakraborty is a lawyer, with over two years of experience in legal research and analysis. She specializes in working closely with expert witnesses, offering critical support in preparing legal research and detailed case studies.