Skip to main content

Driver Found Liable in Rear-End Collision, Jury Awards $688K to Injured Plaintiff

Driver Found Liable in Rear-End Collision, Jury Awards $688K to Injured Plaintiff

AC

Angad Chatha

Angad Chatha is a law graduate from Amritsar, Punjab, with over two years of experience in legal research and analysis. He has developed a strong niche in working with expert witnesses, providing critical support in preparing legal research and case studies. Known for his analytical mindset and attention to detail, Angad consistently delivers thorough and well-grounded insights that enhance case summaries. His commitment to accuracy and a deep understanding of legal frameworks make him a valuable asset in complex legal sector.

3 min read
Driver Found Liable in Rear-End Collision, Jury Awards $688K to Injured Plaintiff

Rear-End Collision Negligence Lawsuit

Plaintiffs Valerie and Pernica Richardson filed a negligence lawsuit against Defendant James J. Celentano in the Superior Court, Judicial District of New Haven. The case arose from a rear-end collision that occurred on July 8, 2022, at the intersection of Townsend Avenue and Forbes Avenue in New Haven, Connecticut. At the time of the incident, Valerie was driving with Pernica as her passenger.

Incident and Alleged Cause

Valerie stopped at a red light when Defendant Celentano, who was traveling directly behind her, struck her vehicle from the rear. Plaintiffs argued that Celentano followed too closely, failed to brake in time, and drove at an unreasonable speed. They claimed he did not maintain control or keep a proper lookout, which led to the collision.

Nature and Extent of Injuries

Both Plaintiffs sustained multiple soft tissue injuries. Valerie suffered thoracic and lumbar strains, shoulder pain, muscle spasms, and anxiety. Pernica experienced similar spinal injuries and muscle spasms. Both reported fatigue, sleeplessness, and post-traumatic headaches that disrupted their daily lives and required ongoing treatment. Emotional distress and anxiety were also documented.

Damages Sought by Plaintiffs

Each Plaintiff claimed damages exceeding $15,000, excluding interest and court costs. The claims included compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, emotional hardship, and future treatment costs. Plaintiffs asserted that Defendant’s negligence directly caused all losses.

Key Arguments and Proceedings

  • Plaintiff: Valerie Richardson

  • Counsel for Plaintiff: Nicholas R. Nesi | Michael P. D’Amico

  • Expert Witness for the Plaintiff: Kenneth Donahue | Virginia McKenna | Eric Katz

  • Defendant: James J. Celentano

  • Counsel for Defendant: Mary Ann McCluskey

Claims Against Defendant

Plaintiffs accused Defendant Celentano of motor vehicle negligence. Valerie alleged that Celentano followed her car too closely, failed to stop at a red light, and drove at an unreasonable speed. She argued that these actions caused multiple physical injuries, emotional trauma, and the need for ongoing medical care. The complaint sought compensatory damages for pain, suffering, medical costs, and anticipated future treatment.

Defense Position

Defendant Celentano admitted that the rear-end collision occurred but denied liability for the Plaintiffs’ injuries. He argued that he was not negligent and challenged the connection between the accident and the claimed injuries. Celentano admitted he failed to maintain control but denied other allegations, such as excessive speed and following too closely. He maintained that Plaintiffs’ injuries were unsubstantiated and required proof, and he contested claims of recklessness or gross negligence.

Jury Verdict

On February 20, 2025, the jury ruled in favor of Plaintiff Valerie Richardson. Jurors found that Defendant’s negligence was a proximate cause of her injuries and losses. After reviewing the evidence and testimony, the jury awarded $688,848.57 in total damages. This included $388,848.57 in economic damages for medical expenses and lost earning capacity and $300,000.00 in non-economic damages for pain, suffering, and diminished quality of life. However, the jury found no evidence of reckless conduct and did not award double or triple damages.

Court Documents

Complaint

Verdict

About the Author

AC

Angad Chatha

Angad Chatha is a law graduate from Amritsar, Punjab, with over two years of experience in legal research and analysis. He has developed a strong niche in working with expert witnesses, providing critical support in preparing legal research and case studies. Known for his analytical mindset and attention to detail, Angad consistently delivers thorough and well-grounded insights that enhance case summaries. His commitment to accuracy and a deep understanding of legal frameworks make him a valuable asset in complex legal sector.