Skip to main content

Jury Awards $266K to Carol Canzanella

Jury Awards $266K to Carol Canzanella

By Sohini Chakraborty
6 min read
Jury Awards $266K to Carol Canzanella

Case Background

On August 12, 2018, Carol Ann Canzanella, a Branford resident and law graduate, entered the emergency department of Yale New Haven Hospital. She had been experiencing eye problems for several days. Her left eye was red, burning, and tearing, and she found it painful to look at light. Doctors suspected uveitis, an inflammatory eye condition that could threaten her vision. To examine her further, they dilated both of her eyes.

The dilation impaired her vision. Yet instead of arranging safe transport, staff decided she would walk with a physician across the Yale hospital complex to the Dana Eye Clinic, which was housed in a separate building. The transfer required a significant walk-through hallways and into another section of the hospital. Canzanella’s vision remained blurred throughout this trip, and the overhead fluorescent lights intensified her discomfort.

As they made their way to the clinic, Canzanella told the doctor she needed to use a restroom. Because she could barely see, she asked for help finding the doorway. She then stepped from a carpeted hall into the restroom. The floor inside had been treated with a stripping agent and left unattended by custodial staff. It was slick, and as soon as her foot touched it, she slipped. She fell forcefully, struck her head on the metal doorframe, and hit the floor with her body.

The fall left her with serious injuries. What began as an emergency room visit for an eye condition turned into a long legal battle over hospital safety, medical decisions, and a patient’s right to reasonable care.

Cause

Canzanella believed her injuries stemmed from multiple failures at the hospital. She argued that Yale New Haven Hospital and its employees created unsafe conditions by not arranging proper transportation for her after her eyes were dilated. In her view, a wheelchair or escort should have been mandatory, given that she could not see clearly. Instead, she was forced to walk across the hospital complex while exposed to bright lighting that only worsened her condition.

She also claimed that the bathroom itself was dangerous. A stripping agent had been applied to the floor, and no warnings or barriers were in place. Because she was visually impaired at the time, she relied on staff to guide her safely. Instead, she entered a hazardous environment that was neither monitored nor secured. The slick surface made her lose balance, and she struck her head and body in a way that she said changed her life permanently.

Her case against Yale University, the Yale School of Medicine, and Yale New Haven Hospital combined both medical negligence and premises liability. She argued that the staff responsible for her transfer ignored basic safety measures, while the custodial staff left behind an unsafe condition that posed obvious risks.

Injury

The fall caused an array of serious and lasting injuries. Canzanella struck her head, resulting in a concussion and what doctors later diagnosed as a traumatic brain injury. She developed post-concussive syndrome, which brought memory loss, cognitive problems, and persistent headaches. She also injured her arm, hand, spine, and pelvis.

Her complaint described additional symptoms that lingered over time. She reported a loss of taste, hearing problems that included hyperacusis and sensorineural hearing loss, and chronic pain in her back and neck. She also suffered from bladder and bowel difficulties, which she linked to the trauma of the fall. Doctors noted both physical and neurocognitive impairments that they considered permanent.

For Canzanella, these injuries altered daily life. She said her ability to work diminished, her independence suffered, and her enjoyment of normal activities was no longer the same.

Damages

The lawsuit sought compensation for the full scope of her losses. She asked the jury to consider her past and future medical costs, which included extensive therapy, diagnostic imaging, neurocognitive treatment, and ongoing specialist care. She also pursued damages for lost wages and diminished earning capacity, pointing out that the injuries limited her ability to continue her career with the same focus and energy.

Equally important, she described the pain, suffering, and emotional toll she endured since the fall. The loss of independence, the daily struggle with symptoms, and the frustration of permanent impairments, she said, could not be measured only in bills and receipts.

Key Arguments and Proceedings

Legal Representation

Plaintiff: Carol Ann Canzanella

·       Counsel for Plaintiff: Carl A. Secola

·       Experts for Plaintiff: Steven Boksenbaum |Maria Sappe | Brian D. Greenwald | Eugenia Boris Betz | Jill Deutsch | Jennifer Franson-Hopper | Rhonda Gold | Mayer Hasbani | Kathryn Frances Hawk | Yiduo Ian Hu | Kathryn Rau Leinhardt | Douglas Hildrew | Oyere K. Onuma | Imran Habib Quraishi | William Ravich | Leslie Rickey | Basmah Safdar | Aaron N. Tessler | Elizabeth Muskin |Lauren Pocius | Annette Theis | Anne Pacileo| Alyssa Natalino | Michael D. Mollow | Travis Snyder | Harold Bialsky | Joseph T. Crouse

Defendants: Yale New Haven Hospital, Inc | Yale University | Yale University School of Medicine

·       Counsel for Defendants: Miles N. Esty

·       Experts for Defendants: Aaron N. Tessler | Leo John Wolansky | Bonnie E. Levin | Patrick P. Coll

Claims Asserted

Canzanella’s counsel emphasized that Yale failed in two ways. First, it did not provide safe medical management when it required a patient with dilated eyes to walk across the hospital unescorted. Second, it failed to keep its premises safe by leaving a restroom in a dangerous condition. In their telling, the fall was entirely preventable if reasonable care had been taken.

Defense

The defense countered that its staff acted appropriately and within accepted standards. They admitted some background facts, such as her presence at the hospital and the employment of the doctors and nurse, but denied responsibility for her injuries. They suggested that she was partly responsible, arguing that she failed to watch out for herself, did not exercise care, and was negligent in the way she entered the restroom. This special defense of contributory negligence became a key part of the trial.

Jury Verdict

On July 17, 2024, the jury returned its verdict. They sided with Carol Ann Canzanella and held Yale University, Yale School of Medicine, and Yale New Haven Hospital responsible for her injuries.

The jury awarded her compensation that included medical bills of $ 46,143, non economic damages of both past and future amounting to $ 100,000 and amount of $ 20,000 for loss of earning capacity, total of which amounted to $ 266,143.

By reaching this decision, the jury concluded that the hospital’s medical and custodial failures set in motion the chain of events that left her permanently impaired.

Court Documents

Complaint

Jury Verdict

 

 

 

About the Author

SC

Sohini Chakraborty

Sohini Chakraborty is a lawyer, with over two years of experience in legal research and analysis. She specializes in working closely with expert witnesses, offering critical support in preparing legal research and detailed case studies.