Skip to main content

Jury Clears Dog Owner in Connecticut Injury Lawsuit

Jury Clears Dog Owner in Connecticut Injury Lawsuit

AC

Angad Chatha

Angad Chatha is a law graduate from Amritsar, Punjab, with over two years of experience in legal research and analysis. He has developed a strong niche in working with expert witnesses, providing critical support in preparing legal research and case studies. Known for his analytical mindset and attention to detail, Angad consistently delivers thorough and well-grounded insights that enhance case summaries. His commitment to accuracy and a deep understanding of legal frameworks make him a valuable asset in complex legal sector.

2 min read
Jury Clears Dog Owner in Connecticut Injury Lawsuit

Setting the Scene

On August 22, 2022, Jane Ellen Peregrin was walking her dog near 120 Stony Corners Circle in Avon, Connecticut. Asauntewa Calaway’s dog was also present in the area. Jane remained on public property and acted responsibly. What followed was unexpected.

What Went Wrong

Calaway’s dog knocked Jane to the ground during the walk. She was trying to control her own dog when she fell. This sudden impact caused serious harm. Connecticut law imposes strict liability on dog owners for such events. Jane asserted that Calaway owned and kept the dog

How She Was Hurt

Jane suffered a right transverse patellar fracture and pain in her left knee. The injuries caused severe discomfort and emotional distress. She stayed sore and partially disabled. The complaint noted her injuries may be long-lasting or permanent.

The Lasting Impact

Jane sought medical care, medications, and vaccinations. The injuries limited her ability to enjoy daily life. Ongoing treatment seemed likely. She also experienced emotional suffering. The damages sought exceeded $15,000, excluding interest and court costs.

Key Arguments and Proceedings

Plaintiff: Jane Ellen Peregrin

Counsel for Plaintiff: Christopher Cramer

Defendant: Asauntewa Calaway

Counsel for Defendant: Cynthia M. Garraty

Jane filed a strict liability claim under Connecticut General Statutes §22-357. She asked for monetary damages and other relief the court considered fair. Her attorney, Christopher Cramer of Trantolo & Trantolo, LLC, brought the case. The return date was set for February 7, 2023, in Hartford Superior Court.

Defense

The Defendant admitted the initial allegation in the complaint. For the remaining claims, the Defendant stated she lacked sufficient knowledge or information to confirm or deny them. She therefore denied those allegations and required the Plaintiff to prove them in court.

Jury Verdict

On December 12, 2024, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the Defendant, Asauntewa Calaway. The jury found that the Defendant was not liable for the Plaintiff’s injuries under Connecticut General Statutes §22-357. As a result, the court entered judgment for the Defendant.

Court Documents

Complaint

Verdict

About the Author

AC

Angad Chatha

Angad Chatha is a law graduate from Amritsar, Punjab, with over two years of experience in legal research and analysis. He has developed a strong niche in working with expert witnesses, providing critical support in preparing legal research and case studies. Known for his analytical mindset and attention to detail, Angad consistently delivers thorough and well-grounded insights that enhance case summaries. His commitment to accuracy and a deep understanding of legal frameworks make him a valuable asset in complex legal sector.