Skip to main content

LA City Settles Family's Car Crash Lawsuit for $562,500

LA City Settles Family's Car Crash Lawsuit for $562,500

By Sohini Chakraborty
5 min read
LA City Settles Family's Car Crash Lawsuit for $562,500

Case Background

A legal dispute initiated by David and Eva Beri against the City of Los Angeles and City employee Rochelle C. Feldman concluded with a substantial settlement agreement. The Beris filed the lawsuit in the Los Angeles Superior Court in January 2022 after they suffered injuries in a motor vehicle accident involving a City vehicle driven by Feldman. The Plaintiffs asserted that the negligence of the City employee caused the collision and their resulting physical and emotional harm. The case moved through the Court system toward a scheduled trial date in 2023, but the parties ultimately reached a resolution before a jury heard the evidence.

Cause

The Beris’ Complaint centered on a single, clear cause of action: Negligence.

Negligence of the Driver The Plaintiffs contended that Rochelle C. Feldman, who was acting within the scope of her employment for the City of Los Angeles at the time, failed to operate her vehicle safely. They asserted that Feldman's careless driving directly caused the collision with the Beris’ vehicle. As a result, the Beris claimed that Feldman breached her fundamental duty to exercise reasonable care while driving, which is the legal standard for negligence in a motor vehicle accident.

Vicarious Liability of the City Since Feldman was working for the City of Los Angeles when the accident happened, the Beris also named the City as a Defendant. They argued that the City was legally responsible, or "vicariously liable," for the negligent actions of its employee under the principle of respondeat superior. This legal theory holds an employer responsible for the wrongful acts of its employees when those acts occur during their job duties.

Injury

David and Eva Beri both claimed they sustained serious and costly injuries from the collision.

Physical and Emotional Trauma The impact of the crash inflicted significant physical injuries upon the Plaintiffs, necessitating extensive medical treatment and rehabilitation. Beyond the physical pain, the Beris also suffered substantial emotional distress and mental anguish. Their attorneys claimed these injuries profoundly impacted their quality of life, leading to the loss of enjoyment of normal daily activities.

Financial Losses The injuries resulted in major economic losses for the family. The Beris incurred significant expenses for immediate emergency care, follow-up physician visits, physical therapy, and medication. Furthermore, the severity of the injuries caused them to lose time at work, resulting in lost wages and a reduction in their ability to earn future income.

Damages Sought

The Complaint detailed a claim for both general and special damages, seeking an amount far in excess of the Court’s jurisdictional minimum, to be proven at trial.

General Damages The Beris sought general, or non-economic, damages to compensate them for intangible losses. This category covered the emotional distress, pain, suffering, inconvenience, and the overall loss of life enjoyment they experienced after the crash.

Special Damages They also demanded special, or economic, damages to cover all verifiable financial losses. This included compensation for past and future medical expenses, lost wages, and any decrease in their future earning capacity directly caused by the accident. Finally, the Beris sought to recover all costs and interest incurred while pursuing the lawsuit.

Key Arguments and Proceedings

The City of Los Angeles and Rochelle C. Feldman formally responded to the lawsuit in March 2022. The case was assigned to Judge Audra Mori and moved into the discovery phase, where both legal teams investigated the facts, exchanged evidence, and prepared their trial strategies. The case proceeded with a jury trial date set for July 2023, but the parties spent months negotiating a resolution to avoid the public scrutiny and cost of a trial.

Plaintiff(s): David Beri | Eva Beri

·       Counsel for Plaintiff(s): Kevin S. Conlogue | Ashley M. Conlogue

Defendant(s): City of Los Angeles | Rochelle C. Feldman

·       Counsel for Defendant(s): Mark R. Weiner | David Levi Weisberg

Key Arguments or Remarks by Counsel

Claims

The Beris’ counsel maintained that the facts of the case demonstrated a clear-cut example of driver carelessness. They argued that the evidence of the collision including police reports and accident reconstruction details proved that the City’s employee, Feldman, failed to pay attention or yield the right of way, which led directly to the violent crash. Their attorneys were prepared to show the jury the full extent of the physical and financial destruction the negligence had caused the Beri family.

Defense

The defense team for the City and Feldman denied all claims of wrongdoing in their Answer. They likely argued that Feldman acted reasonably under the circumstances, or they may have sought to shift some of the blame for the accident onto David or Eva Beri, arguing that they also bore some responsibility for the collision. The defense would have minimized the severity of the Beris’ injuries, claiming the medical treatment and resulting expenses were excessive or not fully related to the accident itself. They firmly asserted that the Beris were not entitled to the large sum of damages they had sought.

Court Settlement

In December 2023, after nearly two years of pre-trial maneuvering and evidence gathering, the parties filed a Notice of Settlement of the Entire Case with the Los Angeles Superior Court. The Plaintiffs, David and Eva Beri, and the Defendants, the City of Los Angeles and Rochelle C. Feldman, had successfully negotiated an agreement that resolved all claims against all parties.

The City of Los Angeles and its insurer, without any formal admission of guilt or liability for the accident, authorized a final, confidential payment to the Beris. The settlement figure was $562,500. This payment provided the Beris with the necessary compensation to cover their medical bills, lost wages, and their pain and suffering, ultimately allowing them to close the door on the contentious and stressful legal matter.

Court documents are available upon request at [email protected]

About the Author

SC

Sohini Chakraborty

Sohini Chakraborty is a lawyer, with over two years of experience in legal research and analysis. She specializes in working closely with expert witnesses, offering critical support in preparing legal research and detailed case studies.