Skip to main content

Labinot Gjini v. Rebecca Lerud: $22,225 Car Accident Verdict

Labinot Gjini v. Rebecca Lerud: $22,225 Car Accident Verdict

SC

Sohini Chakraborty

Sohini Chakraborty is a lawyer, with over two years of experience in legal research and analysis. She specializes in working closely with expert witnesses, offering critical support in preparing legal research and detailed case studies.

3 min read
Labinot Gjini v. Rebecca Lerud: $22,225 Car Accident Verdict

Case Background

The legal proceedings began when Labinot Gjini filed a civil lawsuit against Rebecca Lerud following a motor vehicle accident in New Haven County. The case moved through the Connecticut Superior Court system at the Bridgeport location under docket number FBT-CV23-6126185-S. The parties participated in the pleading stages starting in the summer of 2023. The litigation continued for over two years until the matter finally reached a jury trial in January 2026.

Cause

The collision occurred on July 24, 2022, at the intersection of Milford Circle and Boston Post Road in Milford, Connecticut. Labinot Gjini sat stationary in the right-turn lane of the three-lane road while heading north. At the same time, Rebecca Lerud drove her vehicle in the middle lane. The accident happened when Lerud’s vehicle suddenly crossed into Gjini’s lane and struck his car. Gjini alleged that Lerud failed to keep a proper lookout, exceeded a reasonable speed, and violated several state traffic laws regarding lane safety and signaling.

Injury

Gjini reported that the impact caused immediate pain in his left arm and left wrist. He also claimed the crash aggravated old injuries he previously sustained in his neck and back. These physical issues led to ongoing mental and physical suffering and prevented him from participating in his typical daily activities.

Damages Sought

The Plaintiff requested financial compensation to cover his losses. He specifically sought money for hospital bills, diagnostic testing, and physical therapy sessions required for his recovery. In his initial filings, Gjini stated that the total amount of money he demanded was greater than $15,000.

Key Arguments and Proceedings

Plaintiff(s): Labinot Gjini.

·       Counsel for Plaintiff(s): Garrett M. Moore, Sr.

·       Experts for Plaintiff(s): Keumhong Yoo | Eric Katz

Defendant(s): Rebecca Lerud.

·       Counsel for Defendant(s): Talaiya M. Buffaloe

·       Experts for Defendant(s): Daniel Weiland

Key Arguments or Remarks by Counsel

Claims

Gjini’s attorneys argued that Lerud acted negligently by failing to control her vehicle. They presented claims that she did not apply her brakes in time and failed to honk her horn to alert Gjini before the crash. The legal team emphasized that Lerud moved from her lane before it was safe to do so, which directly caused the collision.

Defense

The defense team offered a formal answer that denied the negligence allegations. While Lerud admitted she was at the scene, she argued that she did not have enough information to confirm the specific details of Gjini's alleged injuries or the exact mechanics of the crash. She essentially challenged the Plaintiff to prove his case in Court.

Jury Verdict

The jury deliberated and returned a verdict on January 16, 2026. The jurors decided in favor of Labinot Gjini and determined that Rebecca Lerud was responsible for the damages.

The jury broke down the financial award into two specific categories:

  • Total Economic Damages: The jury awarded $7,225 to cover the Plaintiff's medical expenses and bills.

  • Total Noneconomic Damages: The jury awarded $15,000 to compensate the Plaintiff for his physical pain and mental suffering.

The final judgment totalled $22,225. Judge Ann Taylor accepted the verdict on the day of the decision.

Court Documents

Complaint

Jury Verdict

About the Author

SC

Sohini Chakraborty

Sohini Chakraborty is a lawyer, with over two years of experience in legal research and analysis. She specializes in working closely with expert witnesses, offering critical support in preparing legal research and detailed case studies.